Red hatinitiated opensource projects, which use gplv2 or lgplv2. The free software foundation today released the second discussion draft of the gnu affero general public license gnu agpl. But important as both the legal and commercial details are, i believe the true significance of the gplv3 lies elsewhere. Starting in the mid1990s and until the mid2000s, the opensource movement pushed and focused the freesoftware idea.
Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. This page is maintained by the free software foundations licensing and compliance lab. Id like to incorporate gplcovered software in my proprietary system. Gplv3 and software as a service by brett smith contributions published on mar 29, 2007 09. The gnu affero general public license version 3 agplv3 is a copyleft license nearly identical to the gplv3. A product that im developing uses a component that is licensed under gpl v3. List of proprietary sourceavailable software wikipedia. The companies are adopting the cure provisions of gnu gplv3 to help companies fix violations. We, the free software foundation, use the gnu general public license for most of our software. Bruce perens is one of the founders of the open source movement in software, and today is a strategic consultant to companies large and small on issues of open source, open standards, and technology. If you believe that, you could get ahead of the competition by. German company from distributing a product incorporating gpl code until. It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all.
Personally, i dont know if its enforceable, but ianal. Red hat changes its opensource licensing rules zdnet. This has implications for proprietary andor commercial software. Users or companies who distribute gpllicensedworks e. Its a widely held belief that you cant mix gpl code and code covered by other open source licenses. That publication features a letter by the vice president of. Finally, there is no harm in explicitly pointing out what ought to be obvious. This is a little inconvenient for the customer and you, but it keeps things separate.
In some cases, this type of software is originally sold and released without the source code, and the source code becomes available later. You can support our efforts by making a donation to the fsf. One of the biggest concerns when using open source components in commercial products is licence compliance. These licenses encourage commercial adoption of opensource software because they make it possible for companies to profit.
They represent various industries and areas of commercial focus, including it services, software development tools and platforms, social networking, fintech, semiconductors, ecommerce, multimedia software and more. The gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. Gplv3 and software as a service free software foundation. A product is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial commercial, industrial or nonconsumer uses, unless such uses represent the only significant mode of use of the product. By now, the gpl is employed by tens of thousands of software projects, companies and governments around the world, and is supported by large communities of software developers and users who wish to share their. Thus web services companies are safe for now unless torvalds changes his mind, and he has not slammed the door on v3, so long as they are not dependent on other gpl software that does adopt gplv3. In reading it, it is clear that usage of the gpl 2. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. Can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. Companies can build on top of opensource code without needing to disclose the technologies or skills that gave them a competitive advantage. Sometimes, the source code is released under a liberal software license at its end of life. You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from a. Richard stallman at the launch of the first draft of the gnu gplv3 at mit, cambridge, massachusetts, united states.
From here on, red hats new gplv2 software projects will. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. Make it easier for your software project to accept. Can i use gpl software in a commercial application software.
Government computer software acquisition and the gnu. This license is based on gplv3 with a new requirement to ensure that users who interact with the software over a network can receive the source for that program. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint. Using gpl 3rd party code for internal closed source project. Multiple efforts are made by organizations like the linux foundation to help companies consume open source software without worrying about. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. Gplv3s implications hitting home for lawyers slashdot. Otherwise, the programs maintainer may be the holder, or else could tell you how to contact the holder, so report it to the maintainer.
Understanding open source and free software licenses kwork. Gpl software is commercial software in accordance with dfars 252. The more free software well have in commercial environments, the less hassle well have to fix issues in production. Gplv3 and web businesses is the free software foundation. Gplv3 has its own peculiarities, but is very similar in effect to gplv2. For example if it was for internal use only in your company, then you have no obligation to do anything. Our company needs to buy and use a proprietary software to get a competitive edge. The saas loophole in gpl open source licenses whitesource. Gpl version 3 development and publicity project gplv3. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain. Software under the gpl may be run for all purposes, including commercial purposes and even as.
This is a list of proprietary sourceavailable software, which has available source code, but is not classified as free software or opensource software. Can gpl licenced software be used in corporate environments. You can sell your commercial software under its own licence and not ship it with the gpl addons. The license was originally written by richard stallman of the free software foundation fsf for the gnu project, and grants the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free.
However, companies especially software companies are usually scared of the gpl, and your question is pretty vague, so you should. The free software foundation may publish revised andor new versions of the gnu lesser general public license from time to time. The agplv3s section states an additional condition not present in gplv2 or gplv3. Specter writes the gpl version 3 is getting some attention in legal circles, especially as it relates to its interaction with proprietary software and patents. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. How can a company sell licenses for gpled software without violating. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis licensed under the gnu general public license. To his right is columbia law professor eben moglen, chairman of the software freedom law center. If i use gpl software in my application, but dont modify or distribute it, do i have to release my application under the gpl. Affero is the company that developed this gpl variant initially to cover their own web software. I made an extension of an open source project with a gplv3. The gnu general public license gpl is the archetype for free software. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project.
The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as. An overview of the gpl opensource licence and important issues for developers. Details are crucial here but you dont say how exactly the extension is built and interoperates with the main software. Can i use gpl software in a com mercial application. Gpl initiative expands with 16 additional companies. It guarantees end users individuals, organizations, companies the freedoms to use, study, share copy, and modify the software. Two of the first commentaries to be published have come from the legal world, and there are doubtless many more being prepared for purely internal use within software companies wondering whether to adopt the new licence. Revised versions of the gnu lesser general public license. Can i use gpl v3 licensed software in a commercial.
How can saas companies ensure that they are complying to their open. Both licenses have the same copyleft scope, but materially differ in one important way. Loosely speaking, the gpl requires that you offer to make the source code available to whoever you make the binary available to. Version 2 of the gpl, released in 1991, went on to become the most widely used freesoftware license. These licenses encourage wider use of open source software, because they do not impose restrictions on developers who use them. Announcing the gpl version 3 development and publicity project gplv3.
Gplv3 requires patents to be open, agpl requires access to the code if you have access to the service the code provide, not just the binary as normal gpl states. The same tactic may be used by canonical ubuntu for their code like mir, unity, and other codes with cla in the near future. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is the most widely used free software license. We will be turning the microsoftnovell deal into a patentinsurance factor for everybody, said eben moglen, chairman of the software freedom law. However, free software is a real industry, and free software companies with a successful business model pays a competitive salary to its staff.
Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. He spends a lot of time explaining software engineering to lawyers, and law to software engineers and their managers. Many long months ago i committed to help eben moglen and his colleagues at the free software foundation and the software freedom law center write a better license than gplv2. Can i use the gplv3 license for my commercial application. The affero version of gplv3 and i have no idea what affero means addresses web services. If the application is only for internal use, then this is probably not a problem, since you are presumably not worried about your internal users requesting or. The gpl cooperation commitment is a means for companies, individual developers and open source projects to provide opportunities. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software filed on feb 25. Indeed, many such important clarifications are included in v3 which together provide a compelling reason for authors and redistributors alike to adopt gplv3. Walsh penned an article for discussing the gplv3 and the risks it poses for hardware and software companies. An anonymous reader writes last week zdnet put up an article asking a simple question. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software.
Preamble the gnu affero general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works, specifically designed to ensure cooperation with the community in the case of network server software. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporatecommercial environment. The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. Because in short gpl says whatever you change must also be gpl by extension. I have licensed every piece of software i have ever written under the. Users or companies who distribute gpl licensed works e. Another point about the title of your question can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. A company is running a modified version of a program licensed under the gnu affero. Some companies sell software and give away free support. Gplv3 6d thus clarifies a point that has caused confusion about source provision in v2. It updates its predecessor to reflect the changes that have taken place in the it world over the sixteen years that separate them. Its based on issues raised in the august freebsd foundation newsletter.
Can i use gpl software in a commercial application. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. The two companies publicly support open source efforts and both have built products that take advantage of open source software. They enable commercial adoption of opensource software. The gnu general public license v3 gpl v3 for short is the next version of the extremely popular free and open source licence the gpl v2. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without selling the software. If you have a closed source saas type product using gplv3 software on the server do you have to make your source available. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a widely used free software license, which guarantees end users the freedom to run, study, share and modify the software. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. From here on, red hats new gplv2 software projects will have gplv3 cure for license violators well forgive you if you change your ways, says linux giant by thomas claburn in san francisco 18 jun. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works.
408 549 1339 742 107 1119 58 1122 623 978 259 824 1494 398 269 1451 930 435 1518 1041 1386 1322 1436 1221 1129 60 1049 659 1488 804 206 299